Using Pulley
On architectures such as x86_64 or aarch64 Wasmtime will by default use the Cranelift compiler to translate WebAssembly to native machine code and execute it. Cranelift does not support all architectures, however, for example i686 (32-bit Intel machines) is not supported at this time. To help execute WebAssembly on these architectures Wasmtime comes with an interpreter called Pulley.
Pulley is a bytecode interpreter originally proposed in an RFC which is intended to primarily be portable. Pulley is a loose backronym for "Portable, Universal, Low-Level Execution strategY" but mostly just a theme on machines/tools (Cranelift, Winch, Pulley, ...). Pulley is a distinct target and execution environment for Wasmtime.
Enabling Pulley
The Pulley interpreter is enabled via one of two means:
-
On architectures which have Cranelift support, Pulley must be enabled via the
pulley
crate feature of thewasmtime
crate. This feature is otherwise off-by-default. -
On architectures which do NOT have Cranelift support, Pulley is already enabled by default. This means that Wasmtime can execute WebAssembly by default on any platform, it'll just be faster on Cranelift-supported platforms.
For platforms in category (2) there is no opt-in necessary to execute Pulley as
that's already the default target. Platforms in category (1), such as
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
, may still want to execute Pulley to run tests,
evaluate the implementation, benchmark, etc.
To force execution of Pulley on any platform the pulley
crate feature of
the wasmtime
crate must be enabled in addition to configuring a target.
Specifying a target is done with the --target
CLI option to the wasmtime
executable, the Config::target
method in Rust, or the
wasmtime_config_target_set
C API. The target string for pulley must be one
of:
pulley32
- for 32-bit little-endian hostspulley32be
- for 32-bit big-endian hostspulley64
- for 64-bit little-endian hostspulley64be
- for 64-bit big-endian hosts
The Pulley target string must match the environment that the Pulley Bytecode will be executing in. Some examples of Pulley targets are:
Host target | Pulley target |
---|---|
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu | pulley64 |
i686-unknown-linux-gnu | pulley32 |
s390x-unknown-linux-gnu | pulley64be |
Wasmtime will return an error trying to load bytecode compiled for the wrong Pulley target. When Pulley is the default target for a particular host then the correct Pulley target will be selected automatically. Specifying the Pulley target may still be necessary when cross-compiling from one platform to another, however.
Using Pulley
Using Pulley in Wasmtime requires no further configuration beyond specifying the
target for Pulley. Once that is done all of the Wasmtime crate's Rust APIs or C
API work as usual. For example when specifying wasmtime run --target pulley64
on the CLI this will execute all WebAssembly in the interpreter rather than via
Cranelift.
Pulley at this time has the same feature parity for WebAssembly as Cranelift does. This means that all WebAssembly proposals and features supported by Wasmtime are supported by Pulley.
If you notice anything awry, however, please feel free to file an issue.
Impact of using Pulley
Pulley is an interpreter for its own bytecode format. While the design of Pulley is optimized for speed you should still expect a ~10x order-of-magnitude slowdown relative to native code or Cranelift. This means that Pulley is likely not suitable for compute-intensive tasks that must run in as little time as possible.
The primary goal of Pulley is to enable using and embedding Wasmtime across a variety of platforms simultaneously. The same API/interface is used to interact with the runtime and loading WebAssembly module regardless of the host architecture.
Pulley bytecode is produced by the Cranelift compiler today in a similar manner to native platforms. Pulley is not designed for quickly loading WebAssembly modules as Cranelift is an optimizing compiler. Compiling WebAssembly to Pulley bytecode should be expected to take about the same time as compiling to native platforms.
High-level Design of Pulley
This section is not necessary for users of Pulley but for those interested this is a description of the high-level design of Pulley. The Pulley virtual machine consists of:
- 32 "X" integer registers each of which are 64-bits large. (
XReg
) - 32 "F" float registers each of which are 64-bits large. (
FReg
) - 32 "V" vector registers each of which are 128-bits large. (
VReg
) - A dynamically allocated "stack" on the host's heap.
- A frame pointer register.
- A link register to store the return address for the current function.
This state lives in MachineState
which is in turned stored in a Vm
.
Pulley's source code lives in pulley/
in the Wasmtime repository.
Pulley's bytecode is defined in pulley/src/lib.rs
with a combination of the
for_each_op!
and for_each_extended_op!
macros. Opcode numbers and opcode
layout are defined by the structure of these macros. The macros are used to
"derive" encoding/decoding/traits/etc used throughout the pulley_interpreter
crate.
Pulley opcodes are a single discriminator byte followed by any immediates. Immediates are not aligned and require unaligned loads/stores to work with them. Pulley has more than 256 opcodes, however, which is where "extended" opcodes come into play. The final Pulley opcode is reserved to indicate that an extended opcode is being used. Extended opcodes follow this initial discriminator with a 16-bit integer which further indicates which extended opcode is being used. This design is intended to allow common operations to be encoded more compactly while less common operations can still be packed in effectively without limit.
Pulley opcode assignment happens through the order of the for_each_op!
macro
which means that it's not portable across multiple versions of Wasmtime.
The interpreter is an implementation of the OpVisitor
and
ExtendedOpVisitor
traits. This is located at pulley/src/interp.rs
. Notably
this means that there's a method-per-opcode and is how the interpreter is
implemented.
The interpreter loop itself is implemented in one of two ways:
-
A "match loop" which is a Rust
loop { ... }
which internally uses theDecode
trait on each opcode. This is not literally modeled as but compiles down to something that looks likeloop { match .. { ... } }
. This interpreter loop is located atpulley/src/interp/match_loop.rs
. -
A "tail loop" were each opcode handler is a Rust function. Control flow between opcodes continues with tail-calls and exiting the interpreter is done by returning from the function. Tail calls are not available in stable Rust so this interpreter loop is not used by default. It can be enabled, though, with
RUSTFLAGS=--cfg=pulley_assume_llvm_makes_tail_calls
to rely on LLVM's tail-call-optimization pass to implement the loop.
The "match loop" is the default interpreter loop as it's portable and works on
stable Rust. The "tail loop" is thought to probably perform better than the
"match loop" but it's not available on stable Rust (become
in Rust is an
unfinished nightly feature at this time) or portable (tail-call-optimization
doesn't happen the same in LLVM on all architectures).
Inspecting Pulley Bytecode
When compiling to native the *.cwasm
produced by wasmtime compile
can be
inspected with objdump -S
, but this doesn't work with Pulley. A small example
in the pulley_interpreter
crate suffices for doing this though. You can
inspect compiled Pulley bytecode from the Wasmtime repository with:
$ cargo run compile --target pulley64 foo.wat
$ cargo run -p pulley-interpreter --all-features --example objdump foo.cwasm
0x000000: <wasm[0]::function[20]>:
0: 9f 10 00 08 00 push_frame_save 16, x19
5: 40 13 00 xmov x19, x0
8: 03 13 13 3f cb 89 00 call2 x19, x19, 0x89cb3f // target = 0x89cb47
f: 03 13 13 8c ab 84 00 call2 x19, x19, 0x84ab8c // target = 0x84ab9b
16: 03 13 13 5b 12 00 00 call2 x19, x19, 0x125b // target = 0x1271
1d: 03 13 13 9f 12 00 00 call2 x19, x19, 0x129f // target = 0x12bc
24: 03 13 13 e0 45 00 00 call2 x19, x19, 0x45e0 // target = 0x4604
...
The output is intended to look somewhat similar to objdump
but otherwise
mainly provides the ability to inspect opcode selection, see the encoded bytes,
etc.
Profiling Pulley
Profiling the Pulley interpreter can be done with native profiler such as perf
but this has a few downsides:
-
When profiling the "match loop" it's not clear what machine code corresponds to which Pulley opcode. Most of the time all the samples are just in the one big "run" function.
-
When profiling with the "tail loop" you can see hot opcodes much more clearly, but it can be difficult to understand why a particular opcode was chosen.
It can sometimes be more beneficial to see time spent per Pulley opcode itself
in the context of the all Pulley opcodes. In a similar manner as you can look at
instruction-level profiling in perf
it can be useful to look at opcode-level
profiling of Pulley.
Pulley has limited support for opcode-level profiling. This is off-by-default as
it has a performance hit for the interpreter. To collect a profile with the
wasmtime
CLI you'll have to build from source and enable the profile-pulley
feature:
$ cargo run --features profile-pulley --release run --profile pulley --target pulley64 foo.wat
This will compile an optimized wasmtime
executable with the profile-pulley
Cargo feature enabled. The --profile pulley
flag can then be passed to the
wasmtime
CLI to enable the profiler at runtime.
The command will emit a pulley-$pid.data
file which contains raw data about
Pulley opcodes and samples taken. To view this file you can use:
$ cargo run -p pulley-interpreter --example profiler-html --all-features ./pulley-$pid.data
This will load the pulley-*.data
file, parse it, collate the results, and
display the hottest functions. The hottest function is emitted last and
instructions are annotated with the %
of samples taken that were executing at
that instruction.
Some more information can be found in the PR that implemented Pulley profiling support